乐发彩票交流群-平台推荐官方版v2.9.1(2023已更新)

来源：乐发彩票手机版APP0452-09-09 17:48

乐发彩票交流群

《纵有疾风起》：中年群像里的奋斗叙事新注脚******

　　作者：何天平

　　人到中年，生活就一定是安安稳稳、功成名就吗？近日，热播中的电视剧《纵有疾风起》给出了否定答案。该剧讲述了男主唐尘（靳东饰）在遭遇未婚妻烁冰（宋佳饰）“背叛”、公司破产等一系列变故后，组建“草根”创业团队，人到中年东山再起，并最终取得事业爱情双丰收的故事。电视剧开篇讲述了意气风发的男主人公唐尘因“背叛”而破产，无奈遣散了职工，开启了一无所有、负债累累的人生。看到这里，很多观众十分不理解烁冰的行为，唐尘何尝不是？他伤心难过、借酒浇愁、一蹶不振……就在这时，既是曾经多年同窗又是知心朋友的沙舟伸出了援助之手，不断鼓励让唐尘重燃斗志，决定东山再起。

《纵有疾风起》：中年群像里的奋斗叙事新注脚

　　人到中年，东山再起，谈何容易？更何况商场如战场，资金、团队、场地等都成为摆在唐尘面前的大难题。面对难题，唐尘只能顶着巨大压力迎难而上。在唐尘的软磨硬泡下，沙舟为儿子攒下的学费成为了他们的资金，这样情比金坚的友情让人动容；笔触犀利的记者沙舟、口才卓绝却总胆小犯怂的律师祝燃、深谙游戏规则的“狗仔”侯志、朝气蓬勃的落魄富家女白鹦陆续被唐尘收入麾下。剧情展开，靳东饰演的唐尘带领着四位不同专业出身的伙伴披荆斩棘、各显神通，拿下一个又一个项目。

　　纵观剧情，电视剧《纵有疾风起》在讲述男主创业历程的同时，同时还包裹并探讨着爱情、婚姻、亲情等亲密关系的相处之道。当律师祝燃与唐尘推心置腹探讨各自的婚姻、爱情问题时，祝燃的一番话对唐尘犹如“当头一棒”，醍醐灌顶般地让唐尘醒悟，原来他从对烁冰曾经的忽略中回过神来，这一刻他渐渐明白相互尊重、相互理解这种抽象词语的真正意义。其实，除了唐尘与烁冰的感情问题，剧中沙舟和祝燃各自的婚姻也反映了现实很多夫妻的问题，侯志和白鹦则表征着一种年轻人之间的爱情，侯志和父亲之间拧巴的亲情亦然，电视剧《纵有疾风起》对多重亲密关系进行了深入描摹，颇能让观众有所共鸣、与之共情，进而让该剧展现出了强烈的正向意义。

　　此外，剧中有很多充满浓郁轻喜剧色彩的情节桥段，这些情节时常能逗笑观众，也会在笑过之后发现眼角含泪，带给了观众很多惊喜。比如男主创业初期团队成员各显神通剧情像极了“西游队伍”升级打怪，而团队姓氏之间的相似点也让观众会心一笑。剧中诸如此类的笑点不胜枚举，这些诙谐的笔法让整部剧在紧张严肃，甚至危机重重的公关事件里显示出了幽默的力量，带来快乐、释放感极强的观剧体验。简言之，《纵有疾风起》在轻喜剧的外衣包裹下，显示出了力图传达给观众人生要有无所畏惧之勇气的精神内核。

　　电视剧《纵有疾风起》在剧情上体现了较强的冲突感，剧情跌宕起伏、悬念重重，展现了商场如战场的紧张激烈。当然，轻喜剧色彩带给观众诙谐轻松的观剧体验，在轻松的作品氛围中向观众传递出“纵有疾风起，人生不言弃”的勇气和力量，用颇具真实感的剧情诉说着人到中年的人生，没有标准答案，只有人生不言弃的拼搏精神。

　　（作者系中国电视艺术交流协会影视艺术专业委员会副秘书长、中国人民大学新闻与社会发展研究中心研究员）

中新网评：处理核污水绝不是日本自家私事******

　　中新网北京1月19日电(蒋鲤)日本政府近日称，将于2023年春夏期间开始向海洋排放经过处理的福岛第一核电站核污水。日本罔顾国内民众及周边国家的屡屡反对，企图将核污水“一倒了之”，把一件关乎全球海洋生态环境和公众健康的事当成了自家私事。

资料图：日本福岛第一核电站。

　　2011年，福岛核电站事故发生后，大量放射性物质泄漏到大气层和太平洋，对周围环境造成了难以逆转的伤害，数十万人被迫撤离该地区。时至今日，作为日本邻国之一的韩国仍未解除福岛海鲜禁令。

　　日本以核污水存储能力即将达到上限为由，在2021年4月13日，正式决定将福岛第一核电站核污水排入太平洋。过去一年多，日本政府和东京电力公司一直在持续推进核污水排海计划。

　　日本政府辩称，这些核污水经多核素处理系统(ALPS)处理后很安全，甚至“可以喝”，这样的表态无疑在愚弄大众。

　　事实上，经过处理的核污水仍含有多种放射性物质，核污水一旦排放入海就无法回收，长期来看，将会给海洋生态带来难以估量的潜在威胁，最终危害人类健康。

　　因此，核污水排海计划推出后，遭到日本民众强烈反对。日本《朝日新闻》2022年3月公布的问卷调查显示，福岛县、宫城县和岩手县受访的42个市町村长中，约六成反对东京电力公司福岛第一核电站核污水排放入海。日本全国渔业协会联合会也多次申明立场，反对该计划。

　　日本政府认为，核污水排海是最便宜、最省事的解决方案，但此举却将周边国家乃至全世界置于核污染风险中。太平洋非日本一家之海，核污水会随着洋流流动，其影响势必会跨越国界，危害周边国家乃至整个国际社会的公共福祉和利益。

　　《韩国经济新闻》发文称，相关研究认为，福岛核污水如果排放入海，约7个月后将到达济州等韩国海域，该国水产业和旅游业将遭受相当大的损失。

　　德国南极海洋机构也曾发出警告，若日本将所有核污水排入海中，不到半年，整个太平洋都将面临高度辐射威胁，包括远在大洋另一端的美国。太平洋地区人民更是对日本该计划持反对意见。

　　日本作为《联合国海洋法公约》缔约国，有义务保护海洋环境。然而，在核污水排海方案的正当性、核污水数据的可靠性、净化装置的有效性、环境影响的不确定性等问题上，日本未能作出科学、可信的说明。

　　国际原子能机构技术工作组虽已三次赴日实地考察评估，但尚未就日排海方案的安全性给出结论，并且对日本提出诸多澄清要求和整改意见。在此情况下，日本仍执意推进核污水排海工程建设，这是极不负责任的行为。

　　太平洋不是日本的下水道，日本必须正视各方合理关切，在与周边国家等相关利益方和国际原子能机构充分协商后，制定合理的核污水处理方案。日本也要着眼长远，若只顾眼前，执意将核污水排放入海，不仅其自身，周边国家乃至全世界都将为之买单，其后果必将会危害数代人。

　　Fukushima water disposal by no means Japan’s own business

　　By John Lee

　　(ECNS) -- Japan has announced it will release treated wastewater from the wrecked Fukushima Daiichi Nuclear Power Plant into the Pacific Ocean this year.

　　Although Fukushima wastewater disposal affects global marine ecological environment protection and public health, Japan has turned a deaf ear to domestic and international opposition to dumping the contaminated water into the sea, treating the "global" matter as its own business.

　　The Fukushima accident in 2011 had sent large quantities of radiation into the atmosphere and the Pacific Ocean, causing irreversible damage to the surrounding environment, and hundreds of thousands of people were forced to evacuate the area. South Korea still maintains its import ban on Japanese seafood from areas affected by the Fukushima nuclear disaster.

　　On April 13, 2021, Japan announced it had decided to discharge contaminated radioactive wastewater in Fukushima Prefecture into the sea due to dwindling storage space, with the Japanese government and plant operator Tokyo Electric Power Company Holdings Inc. promoting the release plan over the past year.

　　The Japanese government argues that the water treated by an advanced liquid processing system, or ALPS, is safe and drinkable, which is undoubtedly fooling the public.

　　In fact, the treated wastewater still includes a variety of radioactive substances and can’t be recycled once discharged into the sea, which will pose a great threat to marine ecology and ultimately endanger human health in the long run.

　　Therefore, the discharge plan has been strongly opposed in Japan. According to a questionnaire conducted by The Asahi Shimbun, nearly 60 percent of mayors of 42 municipalities in Iwate, Miyagi and Fukushima prefectures oppose the discharge plan. The National Fisheries Cooperative Federation of Japan has also repeatedly stated its opposition in public.

　　The Japanese government believes that dumping Fukushima wastewater into the sea is the cheapest and most convenient solution, but neighboring countries and even the whole world will be at risk of nuclear pollution.

　　The Pacific Ocean doesn’t belong to Japan and the wastewater flow along oceanic currents will surely break boundaries and endanger public welfare and the interests of neighboring countries and even the international community.

　　The Korea Economic Daily reported that related research concluded that if contaminated water from Fukushima is released into the ocean, it would only take seven months for the contaminated water to reach the shores of Jeju Island, with the country's aquaculture and tourism suffering considerable losses.

　　According to the calculation of a German marine scientific research institute, radioactive materials will spread to most of the Pacific Ocean within half a year from the date of discharge, and the U.S. and Canada will be affected by nuclear pollution. People in the Pacific region also oppose the discharge plan.

　　As a participant of the United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea, Japan has the obligation of protecting the marine environment.

　　However, it hasn’t offered a full and convincing explanation on issues like the legitimacy of the discharge plan, the reliability of data on the nuclear-contaminated water, the efficacy of the treatment system or the uncertainty of environmental impact.

　　Though the IAEA has yet to complete a comprehensive review after three investigations in Japan, the Japanese side has been pushing through the approval process for its discharge plan and even started building facilities for the discharge. It is rather irresponsible for Japan to act against public opinion at home and concerns abroad.

　　The Pacific Ocean is not a private Japanese sewer. The country must seriously heed the voices of the international community and make a reasonable plan for the Fukushima wastewater disposal after full consultation with stakeholders and international agencies.

　　If it only seeks instant interest and insists on discharging the contaminated water into the sea, not only itself, but also its neighboring countries and the entire world will pay for the decision and several generations will be forced to bear the consequence.